Hair Restoration Discussion Forum - By and For Hair Loss Patients
Go Back   Forum By and for Hair Loss Patients > Surgical Hair Restoration > Open Hair Loss Topics

Welcome! This forum has over 180,000 posts and 12,000 before and after photos going back several years. To research a topic or physician, click on "Search" and enter the name.

You are currently a guest with limited access. By joining our FREE community you can post on this forum, reply privately to other members and or create your own profile, blog and photo album. Registration is easy, private and free so Join Today!

If you have any problems with the registration or login process, please contact us. If you are new please visit our FAQ.

Open Hair Loss Topics Post your own new topic of discussion here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Top  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:18 PM
Julius's Avatar
Senior Member
Mentor Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 407
Last Online: 02-01-2012 03:48 AM
Default

Hi there
I have been doing my research on some luminaries of hair transplantation who have had fantastic results, and it seems that they all had high density procedures!!
For example Shuffle had a density of over 65 grafts per cm2 due to favorable scalp geometry in having a small head, while Spex had a density of over 55 grafts per cm2 with minimal balding, I also think evolution had a high density procedure again with minimal balding. Further London lad and NicNitro's large donor supplies, I think, have enabled them to have to achieve a density of over 45 grafts per cm2, meaning they too had dense packing.
Are all truly good ht's reliable on advantageous characteristics that allow dense packing as it seems?
Moreover it seems that in addition to dense packing that the mature high hairline is needed to obtain these results.
For people with normal characteristics over Norwood stage 6; which needs approximately 200cm2 from a donor supply of 7000 grafts and say 1500 by fue can still not achieve high density, this means they would appear thin or see through in harsh light, or that they have high density in most and a bald spot or thin area somewhere. In my opinion and hearing the complainants of many veterans whose continual qualm is density causing may to go back again and again, high density possibly leaving a thin area at the back for the normal guy is they way to go.
I am only speculating please feel free to correct me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2   Top  
Old 10-07-2009, 03:53 PM
Bill - Managing Publisher's Avatar
Administrator
Follicular Demigod
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 16,152
Last Online: Today 04:48 PM
Default

Julius,

You are hitting on some important points. It sounds like you are on the right track with your logic.

Ultimately, what can be realistically achieved per patient depends upon the area of baldness to cover (considering current and future hair loss) and the patient's available donor supply. Surgeons don't typically transplant hair at uniform density. The front is usually targeted for higher densities with tapering off as they move further back on the scalp.

Patients like me in the upper classes of hair loss (Norwood 5A/6) will require a great deal more hair transplanted to achieve what most consider to be "full" restoration. Many unfortunately, don't have enough donor hair to achieve both full coverage and adequate density.

For instance, I've had 9600 grafts and I still lack density in the back half. However, I no longer have any bald spots and my hair transplant holds up pretty well even under harsh lighting, even though there is still scalp visible from the top down view.

Best wishes,

Bill
__________________
Managing Publisher of the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog and the Hair Loss Forum and Social Community

Follow us on Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

Subscribe to our Newsletters | How We Recommend Physicians

-----

To learn about how I restored my hair, view my my hair loss website.

Remember, true beauty radiates from within, not from the skin.

I am not a medical professional and my words should not be taken as medical advice. All opinions and views shared are my own.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.1