|
Hair Restoration Discussion Forum - By and For Hair Loss Patients |
|
||||||
|
Welcome! This forum has over 180,000 posts and 12,000 before and after photos going back several years. To research a topic or physician, click on "Search" and enter the name. You are currently a guest with limited access. By joining our FREE community you can post on this forum, reply privately to other members and or create your own profile, blog and photo album. Registration is easy, private and free so Join Today! If you have any problems with the registration or login process, please contact us. If you are new please visit our FAQ. |
| Hair Restoration Questions and Answers Post a question for other knowledgeable forum members here. Any hair loss sufferers with good advice are also encouraged to respond. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
the reason fue is so time consuming and expensive is that it takes great care and precision to perform. i would NEVER trust this type of surgery to a machine.
__________________
HT #1: Karamikian Unknown # of grafts Sept.2006 HT#2 Nov.23rd, 2007 Dr.Feller Almost 3200 grafts via strip HT#3 April 2010 Fue 200/side into temple points HT#4 February 2011 My Hair Loss Website - Hair Transplant with Dr. Feller |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
No Thanks. Every attempt to automate the HT process has failed or simply underwhelmed.
Take a close look at the size of the punches they offer with this machine.
__________________
Go Cubs! 6721 transplanted grafts 13,906 hairs Performed by Dr. Ron Shapiro Dr. Ron Shapiro and Dr. Paul Shapiro are members of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. |
|
||||
|
I realize it takes a human to operate the machine. but fue grafts are VERY delicate. if they are not removed and handled properly then they are useless. i would only trust certain docs with this procedure.
__________________
HT #1: Karamikian Unknown # of grafts Sept.2006 HT#2 Nov.23rd, 2007 Dr.Feller Almost 3200 grafts via strip HT#3 April 2010 Fue 200/side into temple points HT#4 February 2011 My Hair Loss Website - Hair Transplant with Dr. Feller |
|
||||
|
Some of you guys need to do a little bit more reading about this Neograph machine because I'm not getting to many responses in here. Neograph sounds like the next big thing in HT. I am still getting more info myself but I already saw how a doctor uses it on TV. Here is the link,
http://www.neograft.com/Home_Page.html |
|
||||
|
I've already known about this for several months.
It allows those who refuse to put the hours of tedious work with .8-1.0mm punches, train staff to handle the fragile grafts, and create the smallest possible incisions, to perform FUE. It attempts to bypass the human handling of the grafts through suction. Ask Dr. Feller and others who have seen this what they think. FUE is HARD and hard to get good at..it takes time. Once a person goes through the learning process, any "benefit" gained through this machine is negated. Remember, a human still has to mimic the follicle angle. This machine is also very expensive. Obviously, this is just my personal opinion. Take Care, Jason
__________________
Go Cubs! 6721 transplanted grafts 13,906 hairs Performed by Dr. Ron Shapiro Dr. Ron Shapiro and Dr. Paul Shapiro are members of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. |
|
||||
|
LT,
Though automation sounds like a good idea in theory to increase speed and the effectiveness of a procedure, many before Neograft have tried and failed. The reason for this is because no matter what, it's the skill and experience of the physician and technicians (not the tool) that's paramount. Also, don't be fooled by any promises of non-scarring hair transplant surgery. FUE via any tool including the NeoGraft will leave a tiny white dot. Though under optimal conditions, scarring won't be visible even when hair is worn or cropped short. I'm not suggesting that good quality tools can't improve a procedure. After all, many dedicated physicians have recently designed innovative tools to help improve FUE. Names like Coalition members Dr. Feller and Dr. Devroye come to mind. Recommended physician Dr. Harris has also engineered his own tool. See the links below. Recommended physician Dr. Harris' New FUE Tool Coalition Member Dr. Devroye's New FUE Tool (with video) Coalition Member Dr. Feller's New FUE Tool That said, I really don't know how Neograft will compare to these other innovative tools and whether or not it can deliver what it promises. I suppose if/when physicians begin to use it, we'll let them offer a review on how it's helped or hindered their practice. In the meantime, remember that a tool is just a tool and a tool is only as effective as the physician that utilizes it. Best wishes, Bill
__________________
Managing Publisher of the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog and the Hair Loss Forum and Social Community View our hair loss articles on Hub Pages Follow us on Facebook | Twitter | YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletters | How We Recommend Physicians ----- To learn about how I restored my hair, view my my hair loss website. Remember, true beauty radiates from within, not from the skin. I am not a medical professional and my words should not be taken as medical advice. All opinions and views shared are my own. |
|
||||
|
Bill (Bill, if I may call you Bill hahaha),
I'm glad you brought up the delicacy necessary in removal and handling extracted follicular units. I investigated NeoGraft a few months back, as a local cosmetic surgeon brought the tool to his office and wrote a long post on his site about it, and to me - it seemed between automating the process of removing follicular units and having a high survival rate, one greatly outweighs the other. I don't see the need to take the physician touch out of such a delicate process, and I would love to see results of a procedure using NeoGraft - as surgeons such as Dr Feller have posted intricate details concerning their new tools and the procedure results. Furthermore, these tools don't seem to put the focus on automation, instead they seem to focus on handling the grafts more delicately and lowering transection rates. I personally would stick with a coalition physician performing FUE.
__________________
Blake (Future_HT_Doc) Forum Co-Moderator and Editorial Assistant for the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog, and the Hair Restoration Forum All opinions are my own and my advice should not constitute as medical advice. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|