Hair Restoration Discussion Forum - By and For Hair Loss Patients
Go Back   Forum By and for Hair Loss Patients > Surgical Hair Restoration > Hair Restoration Results Posted by Patients

Welcome! This forum has over 180,000 posts and 12,000 before and after photos going back several years. To research a topic or physician, click on "Search" and enter the name.

You are currently a guest with limited access. By joining our FREE community you can post on this forum, reply privately to other members and or create your own profile, blog and photo album. Registration is easy, private and free so Join Today!

If you have any problems with the registration or login process, please contact us. If you are new please visit our FAQ.

Hair Restoration Results Posted by Patients Feel free to post your hair transplant photos here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Top  
Old 09-17-2009, 07:52 PM
Stuart01's Avatar
Senior Member
Hard Core Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 165
Last Online: 05-16-2012 08:46 AM
Default

I would not give up hope. It appears the there was nice improvement over the last 4 weeks. You still have another 3 to 5 months for more improvement
__________________
I am employed as the patient coordinator and office manager for Chicago Hair Transplant Clinic. Feel free to ask me any questions.

Dr. Panine is recommended on the Hair Transplant Network
Reply With Quote
  #12   Top  
Old 09-18-2009, 06:58 PM
Shadow of the EMpire State's Avatar
Senior Member
Guru Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 221
Last Online: 04-23-2012 08:49 PM
Default

That improvement is not so great as to make me think that photographical conditions couldn't explain the difference.

I suppose that this isn't the thread in which to say this, but I'd rather not burden the forum with a new thread, so I'll say it here: even now, in 2009, the quality of the average transplant--even from the so-called top doctors--is rarely acceptable. Unless we develop a new method to create NEW hair, we will continue to see subpar results.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Top  
Old 09-18-2009, 07:18 PM
Senior Member
Guru Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 382
Last Online: 05-13-2012 08:58 PM
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shadow of the EMpire State:
That improvement is not so great as to make me think that photographical conditions couldn't explain the difference.

I suppose that this isn't the thread in which to say this, but I'd rather not burden the forum with a new thread, so I'll say it here: even now, in 2009, the quality of the average transplant--even from the so-called top doctors--is rarely acceptable. Unless we develop a new method to create NEW hair, we will continue to see subpar results.
I respect your opinion, but if the poor growth he experienced was the average result from top HT surgeons, this forum would likely reflect that. Although I would love to know what percentage do run into poor yield.
Reply With Quote
  #14   Top  
Old 09-18-2009, 11:08 PM
No Longer Active
Guru Real Hair Club Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Athens
Posts: 260
Last Online: 04-24-2011 04:43 AM
Default

i dont see improvement in the pics as far as growth. the later pic has longer hair. his crown looks better than the 1st pic but he didnt have ht in the crown so the improvement we see is just longer hair and not more hair
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0