I have to agree that this result looks thin. I say that based on my own results. I had around 3800 grafts in the front half and it gave me much better density in that area (and I didn't have much hair there).

Having said that, this man should not expect super dense hair from 7800 grafts over such a large area, but I would expect more that what I am seeing.

__________________
____________
2700 Total Grafts w/ Keene 9/28/05
663 one's = 663
1116 two's = 2232
721 three's = 2163
200 four's = 800
Hair Count = 5858

1000 Total Grafts w/Keene 2/08/07
Mostly combined FU's for 2600+ hairs

My Photo Album

See me at Dr. Keene's Gallery

Half of 35,000 to 40,0000 is about 19000 so therfore he should have the illusion of density, which he does not have.

Also at 7800 grafts this guy must have had above average donar qualties if he had 19,000 hairs. Im not trying to harp on this but for this amount of grafts it just doesnt stand up to the Shapiro's, Fellers, Rahals, H&W's of the world. I would be dissapointed!

To add to this.... The back 2/3rd's seem to look the same in the before and the afters. The only improvment "which is very slight" is in the front 1/3rd.