|
Hair Restoration Discussion Forum - By and For Hair Loss Patients |
|
||||||
|
Welcome! This forum has over 180,000 posts and 12,000 before and after photos going back several years. To research a topic or physician, click on "Search" and enter the name. You are currently a guest with limited access. By joining our FREE community you can post on this forum, reply privately to other members and or create your own profile, blog and photo album. Registration is easy, private and free so Join Today! If you have any problems with the registration or login process, please contact us. If you are new please visit our FAQ. |
| Results Posted by Leading Hair Restoration Clinics Surgeons recommended on the Hair Transplant Network should post your hair transplant photos here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
I think I would have just had the plugs removed and just lived with the scars. The hairline looks very nice now, but something about the top down shot looks unnatural to me. Maybe he just needs another pass.
|
|
||||
|
I agree with Dakota on this one. This guy looked atrocious with those old plugs, but now his hairline looks very natural. I'm trying not to get too caught up in graft counts because there are a number of recent posts from physicians that show that hair characteristics play a far greater role in getting good looking coverage than a simple graft count. For all we know this patient may have had very thin hair. If he had 4,000 grafts exactly, his average would be 1.96 hairs per graft, a number that is below the 2.2 average. I would absolutely go for another pass (if possible) to add some coverage, but the improvement for a repair is truly outstanding in my opinion.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|