39 Years Old;
Grafts: 3916;
Hairs: 6989;
Donor Area: 36cm;
Result Photos: 1 year;
Number of Sessions: 01.

I don't mean to be critical, but I would be dissatisfied with this result. This guy had moderate hair loss, almost 4,000 grafts were used, and it is still thin. Furthermore, there is a noticeable difference in density between the hairline and the area immediately behind. I'm not impressed, but I look forward to others opinions.

I agree that there is a noticable difference between the frontal 1/3 and the back 2/3rd's however in most cases with the expectations of furthur loss "this guy seems to be well on his way to a full NW6" there should be a transition of thicker hair in the front and thinning as you go back. IMO this is a true representation of what 4,000 grafts can do for you and the others you see here are "cherry picked results" who a fewer and far between in real life. I will say though that it does seem to go from ultra dense to sparse real quick. I think maybe it could have been trasitioned a little better